Traditional vs modern way of mole removal
Thought of sharing with the readers out there especially those who are interested to get their moles removed; particularly on the face area since it is the most visible part on our body;readily to be seen. I myself done it twice; removing the 2 moles on my face; using both mentioned methods. Below I'm gonna list down all the pros and cons that I could possible think of.
1) Cheaper as it only cost me rm50.
2) You won't have the feeling like you're getting shoot right on your face as the thing used to remove the mole is only some liquid and cotton bud. It is gentler. Emotionally you are calmer and more relax.
3) You sit vertically instead of lying down like a patient. The feeling is definitely different I tell you. Psychologically, nervousness will hit you once you are lying horizontally; rather vertically.
1) My mole; which is kinda small; took me 2 session to completely get it removed. You see, some liquid are being applied to your mole; rather than lasering it; and killing the cells directly. So, using the traditional way may not completely remove that black spot of yours.
2) The area around the mole are redder and more swollen compared with the modern way as the liquid may seep or transfered to the skin/area surrounding the mole due to the usage of cotton bud.
3) The pain goes off slower compared with the laser removal method.
4) It may not be done by certified practitioner.- but heck, its just mole. not some organs or body part right??
5) You wouldn't know what is the content of the liquid used - kinda corrosive i presume since it is strong enough to remove the mole.
1) Done by skin specialist Dr.
2) Fastly done-maybe about 1 min for mole of the size 15mm.
3) Laser are directed directly at your mole; so it only kills the cells that you intend to kill - that is the cells of the mole.
4) More reliable (personal opinion) as I do not have to go for 2nd session - basically it zap off your mole on the spot.
5) Not much of a stinging sensation after the session compared with the traditional method.
6) Healing process are faster. Only small bit of scab; which is your killed and dried up mole.
7) Trusted method as it is laser technology - which is widely used.
1) Nervous breakdown when you are lying down getting ready to be zap.
2) The first laser zap to hit your face freak me out to the max - This is what my friend told me " wei sue ying very pain is it, the first time the lazer touches your face you jerk kinda hard" LOL... How embarassing can that be -_-". Can you imagine you get shoot at your face? Try to imagine.
3) Price-wise - this one cost me RM80; more expensive.
4) If your mole is big, probably you'll get injected just to anesthetize the area that are to be lazered.Urgh~
My final say? If i were to remove any mole of mine again, I'll go for the laser removal method. Slightly more expensive; but hey, you pay a good price for a better and more reliable technique right?
Traditional method
Pros
1) Cheaper as it only cost me rm50.
2) You won't have the feeling like you're getting shoot right on your face as the thing used to remove the mole is only some liquid and cotton bud. It is gentler. Emotionally you are calmer and more relax.
3) You sit vertically instead of lying down like a patient. The feeling is definitely different I tell you. Psychologically, nervousness will hit you once you are lying horizontally; rather vertically.
Cons
1) My mole; which is kinda small; took me 2 session to completely get it removed. You see, some liquid are being applied to your mole; rather than lasering it; and killing the cells directly. So, using the traditional way may not completely remove that black spot of yours.
2) The area around the mole are redder and more swollen compared with the modern way as the liquid may seep or transfered to the skin/area surrounding the mole due to the usage of cotton bud.
3) The pain goes off slower compared with the laser removal method.
4) It may not be done by certified practitioner.- but heck, its just mole. not some organs or body part right??
5) You wouldn't know what is the content of the liquid used - kinda corrosive i presume since it is strong enough to remove the mole.
Modern way using laser technology
Pros
1) Done by skin specialist Dr.
2) Fastly done-maybe about 1 min for mole of the size 15mm.
3) Laser are directed directly at your mole; so it only kills the cells that you intend to kill - that is the cells of the mole.
4) More reliable (personal opinion) as I do not have to go for 2nd session - basically it zap off your mole on the spot.
5) Not much of a stinging sensation after the session compared with the traditional method.
6) Healing process are faster. Only small bit of scab; which is your killed and dried up mole.
7) Trusted method as it is laser technology - which is widely used.
Cons
1) Nervous breakdown when you are lying down getting ready to be zap.
2) The first laser zap to hit your face freak me out to the max - This is what my friend told me " wei sue ying very pain is it, the first time the lazer touches your face you jerk kinda hard" LOL... How embarassing can that be -_-". Can you imagine you get shoot at your face? Try to imagine.
3) Price-wise - this one cost me RM80; more expensive.
4) If your mole is big, probably you'll get injected just to anesthetize the area that are to be lazered.Urgh~
My final say? If i were to remove any mole of mine again, I'll go for the laser removal method. Slightly more expensive; but hey, you pay a good price for a better and more reliable technique right?
